1V. Muralidharan, P. Wenger, and C. Chevallereau, “Optimal design and comparison of 2-X and
2-R planar cable-driven tensegrity-inspired manipulators,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 200,
p. 105721, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2024.105721.
2V. Muralidharan, C. Chevallereau, and P. Wenger, “Coactivation in symmetric four-bar mechanisms
antagonistically actuated by cables,” ASME Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, vol. 17,
no. 1, p. 010902, 2025. doi:10.1115/1.4064981.
3V. Muralidharan, P. Wenger, and C. Chevallereau, “Design considerations and workspace computation of 2-X and 2-R planar cable-driven tensegrity-inspired manipulators,” Mechanism and Machine
Theory, vol. 195, p. 105610, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2024.105610.
4V. Muralidharan, N. Testard, C. Chevallereau, A. Abourachid, and P. Wenger, “Variable stiffness
and antagonist actuation for cable-driven manipulators inspired by the bird neck,” ASME Journal
of Mechanisms and Robotics, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 035002, 2023. doi:10.1115/1.4062302.
5V. Muralidharan and P. Wenger, “Optimal design and comparative study of two antagonistically
actuated tensegrity joints,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 159, p. 104249, 2021.
doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104249.
6V. Muralidharan, A. Bose, K. Chatra, and S. Bandyopadhyay, “Methods for dimensional design of
parallel manipulators for optimal dynamic performance over a given safe working zone,” Mechanism
and Machine Theory, vol. 147, p. 103721, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2019.103721.
7V. Muralidharan, T.K. Mamidi, S. Guptasarma, A. Nag and S. Bandyopadhyay, “A comparative
study of the configuration-space and actuator-space formulations of the Lagrangian dynamics of
parallel manipulators and the effects of kinematic singularities on these,” Mechanism and Machine
Theory, vol. 130, pp. 403-434, 2018. doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2018.07.009.
